Envisioning a world
beyond prostitution.
Speech
at the International Day of No Prostitution Conference at Graduate Centre,
University of Melbourne, October 5, 2002. Sheila
Jeffreys.
Prostitution seen as inevitable
I was talking to
the producer of a Radio National programme trying to get media coverage
for this event this week. She said to me that surely prostitution was
inevitable and so the only reasonable approach was to try to help the
women but accept that it could not be ended. I think that this is indeed
the understanding of middle Australia, and it is seen as the correct
liberal position. I want to suggest today that we have to change hearts
and minds. We have to enable people to believe that prostitution can be
ended along with other forms of male violence. Few people would say that
rape and domestic violence are inevitable and cannot be ended, though in
fact this journalist did just that. In order to believe that prostitution
can be ended we need to be able to envisage a world beyond prostitution.
This gives us something to aspire to. It gives us a sense of direction.
Most of the
responses to prostitution of world, city and state governments, of media,
of ‘right thinking’ citizens, of UN agencies, of the Financial Pages
of newspapers for whom it is a nice little earner, are based upon the idea
that prostitution is inevitable. This is particularly the case in the last
twenty years as globalising forces have given the sex industry, mainly
through pornography, new markets and powers to build their empires. The
burgeoning sex industry has greatly affected the world that we all inhabit
and makes it very hard to imagine a world beyond prostitution. Despite the
recognised harms of prostitution, the massive multibillion dollar industry
of trafficking women and girls into prostitution and pornography, the
psychological and physical harms to the women in the industry, the
degradation of neighbourhoods by men’s prostitution behaviour and the
ill effects of training new generations of men that it is OK to
pornographise and prostitute women, there is still an overwhelming sense
that prostitution is ‘natural’ and nothing can be done about it.
Why is prostitution seen as
inevitable?
At the very basis
of male supremacist societies, at least those that are usually called
‘civilisations’ lies the exchange of women between men. This has taken
two forms, marriage, and prostitution. Prostitution and marriage developed
in a primitive stage of male dominance when women were simply exchanged
between men for a price. In ancient Babylonian ‘civilisation’ women
who were captured from the enemy in war were placed in brothels, and
historians credit this with being the origin of brothel prostitution. The
prostituted slave women belonged to all men for sexual use. The code of
Hammurabi required that non-prostituted women, i.e. those available
through purchase or other forms of marriage for men’s individual use,
should have their heads covered to distinguish them from the ‘common’
women. Non-slave women were exchanged between men for a price and to
cement their relations with other men. In all cases the women were men’s
property. This system in ‘civilisations’ in which men had available
both ‘common’ women and individually owned has existed relatively
unchallenged until recently. It is only since the 1980s that the law has
been changed in some 27 countries in the world to make marital rape an
offence. In all the other countries women’s bodies still belong to men
in marriage. Until so recently and in most countries today, the idea that
women should have the right to withdraw their bodies from men’s sexual
use seemed bizarre and outlandish. The prostitution of women in marriage,
however, is coming to an end. It is no longer regarded as inevitable by
responsible citizens in Australia that women should be penetrated against
their will because of a marriage certificate. But this is seen as
inevitable in prostitution where women hate the violation just as much but
dissociate to survive.
Marriage is
changing. Women are expecting equality in relationships with men. They may
be disappointed but they expect a great deal more than women did a
generation ago. Feminists have expected for a hundred years that
prostitution would end as women moved nearer to equality. But this has not
happened. Instead a massive international industry of prostitution has
developed at great speed in the last few decades. It could be that the sex
industry compensates men for the loss of privilege they experience with
women’s demands for equality in relationships.
The idea that
prostitution is inevitable, I suggest, comes from the idea that women
exist to be exchanged, bought and sold between men, in different forms to
service men’s range of needs. As marriage and other relationships
between women and men move towards equality we need to be able to bring to
an end what Kate Millett called a ‘living fossil’ i.e. a relationship
of slavery from another time that exists as an anachronism in the present
i.e. prostitution.
Harm minimisation
The effect of
seeing prostitution as natural and inevitable is that the only public
policy responses that can be envisaged are ones of ‘harm
minimisation’. This approach recognises that there is harm in
prostitution i.e. street prostituted women suffering severe violence and
death, all prostituted women suffering the risk of HIV and other sexually
transmitted diseases, the continual existence of a very large black
market, always bigger than any sector of the industry that governments
seek to legalise and control, but the underlying philosophy is that
prostitution will and must continue. Harm minimisation covers forms of
maintaining women in prostitution but trying to keep them alive and
prevent the infection of the men who buy them. It includes the provision
of clean needles and condoms, the legalisation of brothel prostitution,
the creation of tolerance zones and even the intention, as in St Kilda in
Melbourne, of creating state brothels, called ‘sex worker centres’
where street prostituted women can take the men who abuse women in
prostitution.
But prostitution is
abusive male behaviour and it has been possible to criticise and build
social outrage against other forms of abusive male behaviour, such as wife
battering, child rape, and create educational programmes, legislation and
services to end them. This approach has not been tried anywhere in the
world in relation to prostitution, though Sweden comes closest.
I want to suggest
today that prostitution is far from inevitable and encourage us to think
of what a world would look like without prostitution. We need to be able
to imagine an alternative or it is very hard to get there. We need to have
a clear vision of our goal so that we are not just reactive. We need
inspiration as well as rage.
I want to look at
what sex and relationships, women’s safety, the social environment in
which women live, travel and work, might look like in the world beyond
prostitution.
Women would not be prostituted
Most importantly,
in the world beyond prostitution, women would not be prostituted. It will
be unthinkable that girls and women might be reduced to, forced to
consider or forced into prostitution. The idea will be abhorrent in
societies based upon men’s equality with women. Whole sections of the
class of women will not be set aside by child sexual abuse, by poverty,
war and other disasters, to be held in common for men’s sexual use.
In the world beyond
prostitution there would be no trafficking in women and children for
prostitution. There would be no sex tourism. There would be no ‘mail
order brides’. These forms of trafficking would not exist because there
would be no market.
Men would grow up
in cultures in which the prostitution of women could not be imagined. With
no demand from men sexual exploitation in these forms would make no sense.
Poor young women would not be forced to exhibit themselves to men and try
to be chosen for penetration as they are in the bars of the Philippines,
Thailand, South Africa. Neither sex tourist men nor indigenous
prostitution abusers would exist in the world beyond prostitution. Women
and girls would not be trafficked around the world in their millions to be
beaten, raped and kept in terror whilst they serviced men for no payment
as they paid of their ‘debts’ to pimps. We would no longer have to see
photos in the press of Asian women or Eastern European women with their
faces obscured being rousted out of the back rooms of brothels in
Melbourne, London, Amsterdam.
In the world beyond
prostitution the international HIV/AIDS epidemic in which men transmit
disease to prostituted women and to their wives would be considerably
slowed.
The class of women
would not be divided into the ‘good’ women and the ‘bad’.
‘Good’ women could not be policed by accusations that they are whores,
or that their husbands will go to ‘whores’ if they do not do this or
that.
In a world beyond
prostitution there would not be the great gulf between women that has
traditionally been created by men’s prostitution behaviour. Men have
separated women into madonnas and whores, good and bad women, for their
own purposes. They have been well served by having loyal wives who ask no
questions and prostituted women in the brothels. ‘Respectable’ working
women have been separated from their prostituted sisters. The gap between
the young female executive and her prostituted sister is apparently huge,
but it can collapse if she acquires gambling debts. In the world beyond
prostitution women will be able to speak with each other without the
tensions created by men’s prostitution behaviour. Women outside
prostitution are encouraged to think that prostituted women are somehow
different, women who actually like to take the smelly penises of many
different men into their bodies every day. But they are not different,
only made so for men’s purposes.
Sex
Let us imagine what
sex would be like without prostitution. Now this is a big subject and I
cannot do justice to it here. Back in 1974 in the UK the demand for a
‘self-defined’ sexuality for women was added to create the seven
demands of the women’s liberation movement. At that time we wanted women
to be able to develop their own ideas of what pleasure could be that were
not dictated by men’s prerogatives. Women’s ideas of pleasure might
include whole body sensuality, they might include affection, even love, as
the basis of a sexual relationship, they might not include sexual
intercourse, or any form of direct servicing of men that women felt
disinclined to engage in. Who knows but that anal sex might not be in the
list created by women’s imaginations. Certainly a self-defined sexuality
for women would be likely to be based upon a woman only engaging in that
which gave her pleasure and not having to perform for men. It would be
likely to be a sexuality of equality based upon respect, and not just
equality in degradation or violence, but a sexuality in which equality and
mutuality were themselves exciting. A self-defined sexuality for women
would be unlikely to include women feeling that they had to allow men to
penetrate them or they would not be allowed to go to sleep, or the man
would have a bad mood, or they would not get the housekeeping money, or
they would have no money to feed the children. A woman might be sexual
when the whim took her or not at all, though she might always want lots of
warm love that was not conditional upon sex.
Now all this might
sound a little quaint. That is largely because, in the last twenty years,
the sex industry has constructed an understanding of what sex is that is
in complete opposition to what so many women have said that they wanted.
Through pornography and other forms of prostitution the sex industrialists
have created a form of sexuality in which men pay to gain access to a
woman who desperately wants to be anywhere else but there and is
dissociating to survive. The man is able to penetrate her mouth, anus or
vagina with his penis, fingers or tongue and grab at other parts of th her
body that are not on the menu. He has no regard for her personhood or
pleasure. This is the sex of pornography and other forms of prostitution.
This is also the
‘sex’ that women in relationships with men find most difficult. Yet
the sex industry with its influence on politicians, media, is able to sell
this commercial sexual exploitation as what sex really and truly is. The
sex industry is the most powerful sex educator in western societies. No
other source of sexual information can compete with the scope and power of
pimps as sex educators. Generations of men and boys are being trained to
this view of what sex is by the powerful inducement of orgasm. This is in
opposition to the vast efforts of women to get men to value them for more
than sex, to value affection that is not sex related, to value sex that is
not just about being a hole for men to enter whilst women think of
tomorrow’s work problems.
The sex industry
has called men’s use of a woman as an object with holes to stick a penis
and fingers in whilst she dissociates to survive emotionally, sex. What
could be more confusing than that? For whom is this ‘sex’? And what
are its implications?
One implication is
that the boys and men require girls and women to act out the scenarios
they have learnt from prostitution to be exciting to them. The women have
to take up positions, wear particular fetishes, and engage in practices
that they may hate in order to gain male approval. As a result there are
reports that teenage girls at parties have to suck off groups of male
teenagers as routine. More and more, young women tell me, anal sex is
becoming an expected part of sexual interaction. The practices of
pornography and prostitution educate men and very swiftly become expected
of girls and women.
Women do not have
resources or an industry to portray what they might want from sex outside
the hubbub created by the sex industry. We do not have a voice, unless we
are coopted to speak within the voice of the industry and say how much we
love precisely the sex that it sells. A sexuality beyond prostitution
would be something very different, something which becomes harder and
harder to imagine as the sex industry takes up all available space for
‘sex’ and portrays itself as a ‘sex educator’. A sexuality beyond
prostitution would be a sexuality of equality in which women and men,
women and women, men and men, find pleasure in each other as equal
partners and companions.
Relationships between men and women
What sort of
relationships between women and men would we like to see in the world
beyond prostitution? Relationships of equality, respect and honesty in the
home, in the workplace and in all areas of life. The sex industry
endangers the possibility of equality in all relationships between men and
women. As new generations of men are trained in prostitution behaviour
this will inevitably affect the way they are able to relate to women in
their lives, family, partners, workmates, friends. Equal relationships
between men and women are still a pipedream for many women but have to be
the ideal form of heterosexuality. The existence of strip clubs, brothels,
pornography and the advertising of these forms of sexual exploitation
create the ideas that boys and men have about women.
One young woman in
CATWA was amazed to discover that tabletop strip clubs only came to
Melbourne in 1993 because she had grown up with them. Boys have grown up
with these clubs too. Once upon a time there were not huge billboards
advertising ‘Gentlemen’s clubs’ in which women place their naked and
shaved vagina and anus in front of men who may stare into them for a few
dollars. The old gentlemen’s clubs were for rich upper class men. In
them these men made deals, political deals and business deals.
The new
gentlemen’s clubs which are a form of brothel in which naked women are
offered to men to bathe with them, to dance on their laps and of course,
offer other ‘sexual services’ are much more democratic. Any men with
the entry fee can go in. But the deals are still made there. The men bond
and network with other men, clinch business deals, hold meetings of
corporations. Major companies hire the meeting rooms at the venues and get
whiteboards plus naked women on the tables at tea break and lunch. What
does this do for the chances of equality for women in these companies?
They can attend meetings and suffer the pain and embarassment of watching
other women treated in this way. They can learn how the men in their
company really feel about women. Or they can refuse to go and lose the
chance of advancement.
Tabletop clubs
already affect the lives of thousands of women. Women lawyers see the male
partners go to the clubs at lunchtimes to bond and wonder why it is so
hard to become partners. The secretarial staff have to lie to wives who
ring up about where their husbands are.
Women executives
are not in the same position as their male colleagues to take potential
male clients to the sex premises of their choice or to arrange for
prostituted women to be sent to their hotel rooms. The existence of the
sex industry and the way it is currently entwined into the way in which
Australian men do business make the idea of women’s equality in the
business world a mockery.
In the world beyond
prostitution there would be true equality in the world of business for
women and men. The idea that deals can be made through the sharing of
women’s bodies will be unimaginable. Men will not stagger back from the
strip club at lunchtime and have difficulty distinguishing between their
female colleague and the vagina he has just paid to stare into. Women
academics who study the male atmosphere of the world of business that
keeps women out, and it is both acknowledged to exist and very effective,
need to examine the way that prostitution in all its forms is one
important foundation of this atmosphere. In the world beyond prostitution
this support to men’s bonding against women would not exist.
In the world beyond
prostitution boys and girls would not grow up in a world in which women
are sold to men, naked or half naked, pouting, spreading their legs on
billboards, on the porn racks in the corner store, in the video store, in
music videos. Girls would not be taught that they are meat for men to buy,
exchange and consume. Boys would not be taught that it is reasonable to do
this to girls because they like it, and they are for that. Girls and boys
would grow up in an environment in which one half of the human race was
not enslaved into sexual service of the other half. Very different ideas
and values would have to be developed by advertisers. Windsor Smith shoes
could not use images of women in prostitution to sell products because
that could not be imagined.
The sex industry is
secret men’s business. In a world beyond prostitution it would be
unthinkable for men to bond through sexual exploitation. Presently,
however, this is burgeoning as an ordinary way for men to socialise. On
bucks’ nights they will sexually exploit women. At other parties they
will watch porn together. Once upon a time 18 year old boys did not have
such clubs to attend with other males as a form of initiation into their
power as men. Local papers carry whole pages of prostitution advertising
to teach boys that women’s bodies can be bought for their pleasures.
Destruction of heterosexual
relationships
Men can not be
equal to women in sexual relationships if they are involved in the sexual
exploitation of other women. The 60,000 men who use women in prostitution
in Victoria each week are likely to have female partners. As the industry
grows more and more men are involved and more and more women are directly
affected. When male partners abuse women in prostitution what are the
women to do? Either it will be a secret and the wife will not know what
her husband is doing which means that the basis of trust and honesty that
should underly any equal relationship is destroyed casting the woman, the
one who does not know, into subordination. Or will find out about her
husband’s behaviour and have to work out how to relate to this man. She
is likely to leave him. His daughters will have to think about what it
means that he stares into the shaved genitals of women their age in the
local strip club, who are all some other men’s daughters, or penetrates
them as they dissociate to survive.
The more men become
involved in prostitution behaviour, the more impossible the ideal of
egalitarian relationships between men and women inevitably becomes. The
expansion of the sex industry and the creation of more male consumers is
in direct collision course with the possibility of equal relationships
between women and men. Let us try to imagine what relationships between
women and men would look like in a world beyond prostitution. In such a
world there is the opportunity for men to be the equals of women.
Environment without prostitution
Women from other
countries, such as Sweden, where the sex industry is not tolerated, suffer
considerable shock in Melbourne at the fact that there are brothels in the
main streets. I have to walk past one on my way to work and back. The
normalisation of the sex industry in all its forms now has a clear and
present influence on the environment in which girls and women struggle to
achieve equality. The idea that women are men’s sexual slaves would not
exist let alone be plastered all over the walls, newspapers and stores.
The effect of this
on popular culture would be that advertising of products would not depend
upon the sale of women naked or offering themselves to men. Advertisers
would need to find other forms of humour for instance that would appeal to
women and men as equally respected citizens. That would be a change.
Fashion would
change. In a world without prostitution the fashion industry would not be
presenting women with naked breasts as a matter of course on catwalks.
Clothing which women would not buy, i.e. which shows most of their bodies
or represents them as pornographic in other ways, would not be the basis
of catwalk shows. It would not make sense to portray women as prostituted
if prostitution did not exist.
Art would be quite
different. Over the last twenty years male artists have over and over
again shown how transgressive and exciting they are by producing what is
essentially pornography but which is accepted by the male art
establishment as great art. The photos of Helmut Newton might be an
example.
The values of
prostitution extend into so many areas of cultural life that it is hard to
imagine forms of entertainment, art, fashion that do not depend upon them.
But men’s fashions, for instance, do not depend upon them. I came across
a photo of men parading on the catwalk at the first London men’s fashion
show in 1998. The men walked comfortably in flat shoes, in loose trousers
and loose short sleeved shirts. No areas of their bodies were exposed to
view. The clothes were all wearable in everyday life. They all allowed
movement, running, reaching up to a shelf, bending over. They embodied a
kind of privilege it is now hard to imagine for young women.
Men’s ideas about
women in a world beyond prostitution would be quite different. They would
not be trained on pornography and grow up to visit strip joints and
brothels. They would not have strippers for their ‘stag’ nights. They
would not have ‘stag’ nights, I suggest, because in a world beyond
prostitution there may be no marriage, or if marriage exists it would not
be seen as a disaster for men. Men would be women’s companions and
friends on a basis of equality. Going out with the boys may have no
meaning because to envisage a world without prostitution we may have to
imagine a world in which men are not so concerned with being men and may
be able to be women’s equals. Imagine men as women’s equals, what a
different world that would be.
Sexual violence
Prostitution and
rape go together. Quite reasonably many prostitution survivors call
prostitution commercial sexual violence or bought rape. In prostitution
men pay to watch (as in pornography) or carry out upon women’s bodies a
range of practices that, in their non-commercial form, are precisely the
practices of male sexual violence that women are concerned to get out of
their bedrooms, their streets, their childhoods, their workplaces. I do
not suggest that prostitution is the only reason that sexual violence
exists because it exists in cultures which do not have prostitution, and
needs to be understood in terms of male dominance. However the sex
industry trains men in these practices.
The main practice
is unwanted sexual intercourse. In this practice the woman dissociates to
survive whilst the man penetrates her with no concern for her personhood.
He will then expect his female partner to do the same. In sex phone lines
women have to dissociate to survive men’s abuse that they have paid to
speak. In obscene phone calls men, sometimes the same ones, intrude upon
and threaten women in their homes. In prostitution men speak foul and
degrading words to women and sexually harass them, touching parts of their
bodies they want to protect and demanding practices women do not want to
allow. In streets and workplaces men do exactly the same except that they
do not pay. The pleasure can be more acute when women's consent is clearly
absent. In prostitution women are whipped, or have to dress up as babies
or young girls. All of this trains and encourages men in brutality and
child sex abuse. Many women in prostitution seek to graduate to be
mistresses because this is less directly violating. But in sm brothels
there are ‘slaves’ who still service the men, indeed mistresses can
direct men to do things to the ‘slaves’.
Conclusion
We would have a
world in which no young girl would be told ‘your fortune, you’re
sitting on it’ which was quite a common phrase of my youth. Young girls
would not be encouraged by offers of fame and fortune to open up their
bodies to oral, vaginal and anal access in porn and then abandoned to
their fate when they were no longer saleable. Young girls would have other
models of how they are and can be valuable which do not just depend upon
their bodies, getting naked or servicing men. They could wear comfortable,
but beautiful clothing. Fashion designers might have to tax their
imaginations to design clothes that showed respect for women, that did not
show parts of women’s bodies, or restrict movement, that flowed and
allowed running, and stretching and sitting even on the floor with ease.
I want us to
imagine the country that Australia might become. We do have models. Sweden
does not have licensed brothels. It has legislation to punish men for
buying sexual services. The culture is not inundated by images of
prostitution. Prostitution is simply not acceptable and is seen as
violence against women in that culture. Sweden also has a very high
percentage of women in parliament and good social policies towards women.
In 2001 I was phoned up by a young Swedish woman who was working and
living in St Kilda on her travels around the world. She saw something I
wrote about prostitution in a magazine left on a tram. She was very
distressed at the way that prostitution has been normalised in Australia.
She told me that young men in her social circle talked of using women in
prostitution and joked about it as if this was a reasonable everyday thing
to do. She was appalled. She had the ability to be outraged because she
came from a country in which this was not imaginable. We can aim for that
situation here in Australia. France, Norway and Iceland are likely to
adopt the Swedish legislation so that there is a very different model for
dealing with prostitution gaining ground in the world. Australia is not in
the forefront of this development but very much at the bottom of the pile.
But most of all a
world beyond prostitution would allow for the creation of egalitarian
relationships between women and men, at the workplace, in marriage, in
friendship, in families. It will not ensure that such equality happens.
There are many other material inqualities between women and men to be
sorted out. But it creates a basis on which this can happen. Whilst
prostitution exists and grows the idea of equality between men and women
is confronted by the huge problem that it is not sexy. It is not the basis
of a huge and profitable industry. Equality requires the elimination of
men’s prostitution behaviour so that we can then look at men’s
relations to women and work out what else needs to be changed.
A world without
prostitution in any form, including pornography, for men might seem very
threatening indeed because it removes the sexual prerogative of being able
to degrade and use women irrespective of their personhood or pleasure. It
means that men cannot access the sexual pleasures of women enslaved to
their will by purchase. A world without such pleasures may seem an unsexy
world to many men. What it means is that we will need to totally
reconstruct what sex is and can be outside the pornographic imagination
and without the model of prostitution.
In a world beyond
prostitution women can relate to each other without the division created
by the different, and conflicting uses to which men put them. Women will
have the opportunity to unite to pursue goals which do not include sexual
subordination, even for a fee.
|